Paper given to Horticulture 100, 1994, © Karen Foley 2019
The goal of inexpensive, chemical-free weed control is unattainable with present knowledge.
use of soil acting herbicides is being questioned increasingly on
environmental grounds. Greater use is likely to be made of glyphosate and
other non persistent herbicides that have little or no effect on the
environment. However repeated use of glyphosate (or other herbicide) over a
number of years is likely to result in a build-up of resistant biotypes.
Weed smothering plants are often aggressive and can become as difficult to control as the weeds they were meant to suppress.
Mulches are effective if used properly but are expensive and often have unexpected side effects. Digging out weeds that will eventually grow through a mulch will quickly impair its weed suppressing properties as soil and weed seeds will be brought up into the germination zone. Better understanding of the properties of mulches will enable them to be used more effectively and economically. Wood chippers are likely to become more popular as a means of providing a relatively cheap organic mulch in situ from tree and shrub prunings.
the future greater emphasis will be placed on an integrated approach using
combinations of methods, such as mulching plus the judicious use of those
herbicides with minimal effect on the environment or herbicides plus physical
It is surprising how some people still hanker after cultivation -good clean cultivation - as if this was the ideal way to manage amenity plantings. Yet plants and soil coexisted for millions of years without cultivation and many modern problems, such as water run-off, erosion and soil compaction only became widespread when man began to cultivate the soil.
The main problems caused by soil cultivation are root injury, the encouragement of further weed seed germination and damage to soil structure. Most plants tend to root prolifically in the surface soil layers and damage to surface roots, even by shallow, careful hoeing, is much more severe than most people realise. The roots damaged by cultivation are the most effective roots - those growing in the fertile upper soil layers. Moreover, cultivation not only damages plants directly by reducing the plants ability to absorb mineral elements and water but also indirectly, as the plant uses up energy reserves in compartmentalising wounds caused by cultivation.
Cultivation encourages weed seed germination both by creating a favourable
seed bed and also by bringing up viable, but dormant, weed seeds from lower
depths into the germination zone.
After cultivation, soil structure looks good to the human eye. This is because
hoeing and cultivation bury the surface soil layer, which has been degraded by
passing traffic or rainfall, and brings up non compacted soil. Many
experiments with fruit crops have shown that, where the soil is not
cultivated, a crust at the surface does not continue to deteriorate annually.
After the first year, structure-forming processes, such as frost action and
cycles of wetting and drying, act on the degraded surface. The structure of
the soil below this compacted surface layer is better than that where land is
cultivated because of the absence of soil disturbance and more continuous
There is abundant evidence therefore that 'non-cultivation' is good management
practice, particularly in view of the high cost of manual labour. The major
imponderables at present are how best to control weeds and how to balance
environmental concern with practicality and cost. No one solution to the
ubiquitous weed problem will satisfy everybody. Similarly no single method can
solve the problem because of the versatility and adaptability of weeds.
Potential 'non cultivation' methods of weed control include the use of
mulches, thermal techniques, biological agents, ground cover plants and
Weeds can be successfully controlled with plastic mulches and with organic materials provided they are applied at a suitable depth. The depth or thickness necessary to control weeds will depend on the type of material used. A depth of about 100 mm when settled is required for straw (Bushnell and Weaver 1930), 75 mm for bark (Campbell-Lloyd 1986) and about 50 - 75 mm for sawdust (Rowe-Dutton 1976). A deep mulch (100 mm) of hardwood bark chips, sawdust or crushed corn cobs gave more effective control than a shallow mulch (50 mm) of the same materials. Provided a 75 mm layer of bark mulch is properly applied, 95% weed control should be achieved over a three year period (Campbell-Lloyd 1986).
Apart from the smothering effect of mulches, chemicals in the materials used can also affect weeds. Phenols and tannins in coniferous bark and sawdust improved the degree of weed control and reduced cultivation costs compared with chopped bark and straw and a mixture of chopped shrub waste and limestone gravel (Kolb et al 1985). Similarly better weed control was obtained in roses with sawdust than with rockwool (Paterson et al 1979). Although organic mulches can be effective against annual weeds they usually have little effect on established perennials.
Perennial weeds can emerge through deep layers of organic mulch and, if
present when the mulch is applied are likely to thrive because of the absence
of competition from annual weeds. Opaque plastic materials give excellent
control of annual weeds and are more effective than organic mulches against
perennials. However, some of the more aggressive perennial species, or those
with sharply pointed shoots such as couch grass (Elymus
repens) can penetrate thin polythene
(38 micron) film (Davison 1983).
Despite the general efficacy of mulches against weeds, problems can arise with
both opaque synthetic and organic mulches. If plastic mulches are torn,
accidentally or to assist water penetration, weed growth through the holes
will be vigorous (Rowe-Dutton 1976). Even with undamaged plastic vigorous weed
growth can occur at the gap around the stem or stake.
Although transparent plastic film results in higher soil temperature than
opaque film and crop growth may be enhanced initially (Agulhon 1975), the
vigorous weed growth that occurs beneath clear plastic is a severe limitation.
Consequently transparent films are little used for mulching perennial plants.
Some organic mulches, such as coir, spent mushroom compost, composted bark and
sewage sludge, break down quickly and provide a good substrate for weed growth
(Insley 1981). Finely pulverised grades of bark, in particular, tend to be
colonised rapidly (Campbell-Lloyd 1986). Moreover, the weed problem may be
increased by weed seeds introduced in certain mulches, such as fresh manure or
hay cut when seeding.
Although mulching is generally regarded as a good horticultural practice,
undesirable side effects can also occur, so that mulches must be used
judiciously. The value of mulching, like many other horticultural practices,
depends very much on local circumstances, such as soil, climate and the type
and growth stage of the plants to be mulched. As far as possible, clear
specifications should be produced both with the regard to the mulching
material and also the way it is used.
It is not surprising therefore any advice given on the use of mulches must contain many qualifiers. For example a peat mulch can be particularly beneficial to rhododendrons and many other ericaceous species (Harig and Witt 1984), but is some circumstances it can be detrimental by absorbing and holding moisture and releasing it again to the air by evaporation.
Organic mulching material is bulky and costly to transport. Consequently organic mulches are likely to be of greatest use in situations where near perfect weed control is required, unless material is available cheaply as a local waste product (Rowe-Dutton 1957). Bark has become an important mulching material in the last decade but a wide range of other materials are also used. These include organic substances such as pine needles (Paterson et al 1979), leaves, sawdust, straw, grass clippings and corn cobs (Gartner 1978); mineral material such as sand, gravel, stones and granite chippings (Wright 1985), rock wool (Paterson et al 1979) and manufactured materials such as plastic, paper, glasswool, metal foil, cellophane and urethane foam (Creagur and Katchur 1975).
Proprietary mulches have also been developed e.g. strawdust consisting of resin impregnated granules of wheat straw. This material is long lasting, sterile and contains a slow release nitrogen fertiliser (Tuefel 1983).
Unlike herbicides, whose only function is weed control, mulches affect plant
growth in a number of other ways, such as the prevention of loss of water from
the soil by evaporation, reduction of temperature fluctuations, light
reflection and prevention of erosion.
By providing a protective barrier at the soil surface a mulch reduces water evaporation (Scholl and Schwemmer 1982). Suppression of weed growth also reduces moisture loss through transpiration. This enables the important surface soil layer to remain moister for a longer period than an unmulched soil surface.
Water penetration into the soil may be improved by certain mulches such as
straw. This is due to a number of factors including the protection provided by
the mulch against rain impact at the soil surface, reduced soil compaction
(Ingle 1981), and probably to increased activity by soil fauna.
Where moisture conservation is a major consideration, organic mulches such as
bark, straw or wood chips will be preferable to plastic as they tend to retain
higher moisture levels (Ashworth and Harrison 1983). However there are large
differences between organic mulches in their moisture conservation properties,
straw being more effective than manure with hay and wood shavings intermediate
(Harris and Yao 1923). The moisture holding properties of any individual
material is affected by its physical condition. Finely ground bark with
particle sizes up to 25 mm, retains more moisture than coarsely ground bark
(75 mm) with a medium grind (50 mm) intermediate (Gartner 1978).
Impervious plastic and other solid synthetic mulches may prevent water
penetration and cannot be laid over large areas without some means of enabling
water to reach the soil, such as perforating the film. In addition the high
temperatures that develop under clear plastic will also tend to reduce soil
moisture levels (Ashworth and Harrison 1983). Plastic formulations are now
available that allow moisture and nutrients to pass downwards, but are still
effective in preventing weed growth.
Higher soil moisture does not always benefit plant growth. On low lying, poorly drained sites or on soils that do not dry out quickly, excessive moisture under mulches during wet springs, may result in root asphyxiation (Agulhon 1975). Impeded drainage and nitrogen deficiency were suggested as the likely causes of the better response of the moisture-loving alder than sycamore and lime to mulches of bark, sewage sludge and press board sheets (Insley 1981).
mulch type creates its own unique soil temperature regime and big differences
have been recorded between organic and plastic mulches. Under organic mulches
soil temperatures are lower during the day and slightly higher at night than
those in bare soil (Paterson et al 1979). Temperature fluctuations are
therefore reduced (Ashworth and Harrison 1983) but organic mulches have less
effect on seasonal temperature variation (Bredell and Barnard 1974).
effect on soil temperature will depend on the depth and thickness of the mulch
material. A deep mulch (100 mm) of hardwood chips, sawdust, jointer curls or
corn cobs had a better insulation value than a shallow 50 mm mulch (Gartner
coloured mulches such as black polythene, absorb the sun's rays and may
increase soil temperature considerably especially during sunny periods. In a
Effect of mulches on soil nutrients and physical properties
Different mulches will affect soil fertility and structure in a variety of
ways. In a comparison of nine mulches, including straw and synthetic
materials, the soil under bark showed the highest pH, organic matter content
and potassium levels (Ashworth and Harrison 1983). Bark mulch also gave a
greater increase in potassium, calcium and magnesium than sawdust or corn cobs
(Gartner 1978). Spent mushroom compost is a rich source of nutrients, an
application of 20 tonnes per acre will provide 36 kg nitrogen, 34 kg
phosphorus and 158 kg potassium per acre (Maher 1990).
Plants of Spiraea japonica mulched with conifer sawdust were smaller in size than unmulched plants after six years, but growth of both unmulched and mulched plants was greatly improved with applications of ammonium sulphate (Kolb 1984, Karbe 1984). The growth of rhododendrons was temporarily improved by a mulch of fermented bark while their growth was adversely affected by unfermented bark throughout a three year study period (Harig and Witt 1984). Better growth of trees and shrubs was recorded with a combination of bark mulch plus nitrogen fertiliser than with fertiliser or mulch alone (Whitcomb 1978).
Apart from the effect of mulching material on nitrification, plant growth may
also be affected positively or negatively by chemicals in the mulching
material. The growth of seedlings of
Plant growth and crop yield
In view of the complex effect of mulches on many different soil functions, it is not surprising that many different types of mulch affect plant species in different ways and that no single type of mulch performs best in all situations or for all species (Ashworth and Harrison 1983). Good response in terms of increased plant vigour has been obtained with a wide variety of different plant materials including pine bark (Insley 1981), hay, black plastic, calcined clay (Litzow and Pellet 1983), heavy duty green plastic (Ashworth and Harrison 1983), bark and sawdust (Kolb et al 1983), and plastic and gravel mulch (Werken 1981).
Mulches of black plastic (38 or 125 microns thick) have given consistently good results on woody ornamentals without adverse effect on any plant species (Davison 1982). In these trials polythene-mulched plants made more growth than those kept weed-free with herbicides or with hand weeding. However, Whitham (1982) obtained a strong correlation between growth of Eucalyptus and weed control with most mulching and herbicide treatments tested. In this work, mixtures of simazine [*] and aminotriazole gave greater growth than pine bark, grass hay, sawdust, black plastic, scoria, newspaper and hoeing.
Britain, a mulch or a combination of mulch plus herbicides often gives higher
yields of apples, blackcurrants, raspberries and nursery stock than the use of
herbicides alone (e.g. Davison and Baily 1980). However, in
The reduction of yield on mulched plots may be due in some cases to lower air temperatures and increased frost injury. Alternatively the effect of an organic mulch in reducing soil temperatures during the growing season or in maintaining excessively moist conditions in the soil may also be responsible.
More extensive root systems have been recorded under mulches (Agulhon 1975, Allmaras and Nelson 1971). The total weight of a vine root system in the 0 to 0.60 m soil layer for a mulched plant was 150% higher than for a non-mulched, cultivated plant after one year. Initially plastic film tends to encourage shallow rooting, 92% of the roots of a mulched vine rootstock occurring in the 0 - 30m layer and none in the 0.45 and 0.60 m layer, compared with only 19% of the roots of the cultivated vines in the 0 - 0.30 m layer. The absence of exploitation of the deeper soil layers by mulched plants is normally shortlived.
Further studies with vines in
only do plants respond differently to different mulches but different plant
species may respond differently to the same mulch. Mulching with bark or
sawdust significantly increased the growth of Hypericum, Potentilla and
Cotoneaster but not of Spiraea, Arundinaria or Geranium (Kolb et al 1985).
rapid development of an extensive shallow root system on vines mulched with
plastic enabled plants to recover more rapidly after planting (Agulhon 1975).
This was attributed to the greater development of surface roots and the better
balanced root system of young plants. The establishment of ornamental
perennials and shrubs was also improved by organic mulching materials
especially bark and sawdust (Kolb et al 1983).
Appearance of mulches
appearance of a mulch is more important in landscape situations than in field
grown food crops or nursery stock. Bark, both chips from softwood and coarse
ground and screened hardwood, make decorative mulches (Gartner 1978). Of nine
different mulches tested in
a surface covering will protect the plastic from degradation by ultra violet
use of mulches can greatly reduce the labour required for weed control. In
Organic mulches such as bark would be used much more widely if they were not
so expensive. In 1990 bark cost around £1.50 -£2.50/sq. metre and polythene
12p/sq. metre compared with 1p/sq. metre for glyphosate (Bisgrove 1990).
The economics of mulching does not depend only on the initial cost but also on the longevity of the material used. Newspaper and a thin mulch of straw had virtually disappeared after six months, but chopped bark, sawdust and black polythene lasted well and were not substantially different after six months (Ingle 1981).
The transport of bulky organic mulches adds considerably to their costs (Insley 1981). About 500 cu. m of mulching material is required per hectare to give a minimum mulch depth of 50 mm. Heavy duty plastic can be handled more easily, but light synthetic mulches are often difficult to lay even in a light wind (Ashworth and Harrison 1983).
Despite the high price of many organic materials, the cost of mulching was
recouped in one year in
The development of new machinery, including flame guns and microwaves, during the 1980s has increased interest in the possible use of high temperatures at the soil surface to control weeds. Modern flame guns using liquified petroleum gas are being used by some local authorities on hard surfaces to suppress weeds either by direct heat or by infra red whereby a heated surface radiates energy onto the weeds. Flame guns work by applying sufficient heat to the weed cells and one of their major disadvantages is that it is difficult to assess the extent of the damage after one pass of the flame (Royal Horticultural Society 1992).
results have been obtained in
With the development of mobile microwave units, field use of this technology is theoretically possible (Moosmann and Koch 1988). Considerable control of weed seeds has been achieved down to a depth of 5 cm with 111 Kilojoules of energy but 140 Kj were needed to penetrate to 15 cm. Mobile microwaves will be very expensive and the main use of this technology is more likely to be in the area of compost sterilisation.
prospects for biological control of weeds in amenity plantings using insects,
nematodes and pathogens are not encouraging. Although striking successes
against weeds have been achieved in a number of countries, the weed species
involved in most cases have been introduced range weeds, e.g.
Opuntia spp controlled in
A mycoherbicide contains the spores of a naturally occurring pathogen, specific to a particular weed species, but which is not normally present in the environment in sufficient quantity to kill the weed. When bulked up and applied in high concentration at a vulnerable growth stage of the weed, mycoherbicides can be effective.
mycoherbicides, 'Devine' (Phytophthora
palmivora) and 'Collego' (Colletotrichum
gloeosporiodes Penz. f.sp.
aeschynomenae) are registered in the
is in also in progress with mycoherbicides for the control of some of the most
common weeds of
Although some progress along these lines is expected, there is no practical
application for mycoherbicides in amenity horticulture at present, and the
possibilities for the future in this area are not very bright.
Ground Cover Plants
they are established, ground cover plants, such as
Erica carnea and
dammeri, can suppress weeds effectively. Until these plants form a
cover over the soil surface, they require as much attention to weed control as
Particularly vigorous plants, such as
Lamium galeobdolon, are
sometimes recommended as weed suppressors because they establish quickly from
small rhizome fragments and their vigorous growth competes well with many weed
species. Such species are, however, very aggressive and can become as
difficult to control as the weeds they were meant to suppress.
Chemical Weed Control
Herbicides are widely used in amenity horticulture in some areas and a large
number of commercial products, based on some 17 active ingredients, are
approved for use in the
Chemical weed control is particularly successful in plantings of trees and
shrubs; the range of herbicides available enables most weeds to be controlled
effectively, plant vigour benefits from the elimination of cultivation and the
cost of maintenance can be reduced substantially.
two main problems facing chemical weed control are:-
1. public pressure against the use of pesticides with particular concern about the possible contamination of drinking water.
the risk of a further build up of resistant biotypes.
Public fears about the use of herbicides is widespread and has led to some
Local Authorities banning the use of certain approved chemicals. These fears
need to be put into perspective. With very few exceptions, herbicides have a
remarkable record of safe use. Public concern has been fuelled to some extent
by the conspicuous protective clothing that operatives are obliged to wear.
There is a degree of ambivalence on the part of the public towards herbicides.
Along with the pressures against their use, there is also strong public demand
for satisfactory weed management standards and criticism if these standards
slip. Land managers can do much to reduce the use of herbicides by formulating
clear objectives about the type of landscape needed (intensively managed
landscape or area of rough land) and by deciding clearly in advance about
appropriate weed management standards.
Clay and Stephens (1992) suggest that public fears could be reduced if less toxic herbicides were available and spray operators did not have to wear obvious protective clothing. These requirements might also be reduced by the use of spinning disc sprayers (CDA) which diminish sprayer contamination as all the droplets reach their target.
contamination of ground water with traces of atrazine and simazine has
understandably heightened public concern about the use of these herbicides.
These fears persist, even though the Advisory Committee on pesticides has
confirmed that the levels detected in the
As a result of the detection of triazines in ground water, the Government announced restrictions in May 1992 on the use of simazine and atrazine on non-cropped ground. The restriction on the use of high doses of triazine herbicides on non cropped ground has been widely welcomed because this was a likely cause of ground water pollution. Since the use of simazine at low doses on crops is unlikely to have been responsible, its use on crops such as blackcurrants, apples and nursery stock is still permissable. It is also permissable to use simazine on private amenity plantings of trees and shrubs but not in public places.
seems anomalous that simazine can continue to be used on shrubs in nurseries,
in private gardens and in fruit and vegetable crops but not at low doses in
shrubs in parks and other amenity situations. This will cause considerable
difficulties in the maintenance of amenity plantings as simazine was the least
expensive of all commonly used herbicides.
It is likely that simazine will continue to be used on woody plants where it is legal to do so and where resistant biotypes are not a problem. In other cases where a residual weed killer is considered necessary, simazine will be replaced by other herbicides, such as napropamide, diuron, lenacil and dichlobenil depending on the tolerance of the plants being grown.
can be done to control weeds in amenity plantings with a rotation of approved
residual, contact and translocated herbicides. Glyphosate, for example, is
rapidly biodegraded in soil to harmless compounds and is unlikely to
contaminate ground water. Some woody ornamental species show a degree of
tolerance of glyphosate at certain times of the year (Skroch 1987) and more
testing of this and other herbicides will benefit the landscape industry.
Although glyphosate (isopropylamine salt of N-phosphonomethyl glycine) is a
valuable herbicide in amenity plantings, present advertisements advising land
managers that the use of simazine should be replaced by applications of
glyphosate in the spring and autumn are unsound technically. This practice if
repeated for several years is likely to lead to the build-up of glyphosate
resistant biotypes. Glyphosate inhibits the EPSP-synthease enzyme which is a
key enzyme in the pathway responsible for the synthesis for some aromatic
amino acids. In the
Apart from the development of glyphosate resistant biotypes, it is also certain that, if a programme of spring and autumn glyphosate application is used for several years as the method of land management, weeds that emerge after the spring application and seed early will become prevalent and cause problems.
weed species have developed resistance to triazine herbicides and two to
paraquat (Clay 1989). The number of species with acquired resistance to
herbicides is very low compared with the numbers of other organisms that have
acquired resistance to other pesticides. However, the adaptability of weeds and
the range of mechanisms that they can use to escape the effects of herbicides
are so great that resistance will continue to build up in many species. It is
likely that within the next decade the difficulty of controlling weeds with
herbicide will be greater than it is today unless more land managers adopt a
rotation of herbicides with different mechanisms and include other methods of
weed control in their programme.
The development of resistant biotypes can be delayed by regularly varying the types of herbicide used and by supplementing herbicides with some physical removal of occasional weeds. Another approach for small intensively managed areas is the adoption of a policy of zero tolerance for weeds. This strategy, based on a combination of herbicides and cultural methods (Robinson 1989), aims at preventing all weeds in an amenity area from propagating themselves, which is the only certain way of stopping the development of resistance. Although the total elimination of all weeds before they seed is unlikely to be achieved in practice, a very high standard of weed suppression, using a range of different control methods, will do much to delay it. A policy of zero tolerance for weeds would increase the cost of weed control in the short-term but is likely to prove economic if assessed over a period of years.
The only way forward is to adopt an integrated approach where a range of chemical, physical and other methods are used as appropriate. Within this approach, it will be necessary to rotate herbicides using a range of non residual herbicides or a rotation of approved soil acting and translocated herbicides
Agulhon, R. 1975. The mulching of vines. Plasticulture 25 supplement au numero 155 (Mars 1975) de la revue 'P.H.M.- revue Horticole' p 1-16
Allmaras, R.R. and Nelson W.W. 1971. Zea mais root configuration as influenced by some inter-row variants of tillage and straw mulch management. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 35:974-980.
Ashworth, S. and
HarrisonH. 1983. Evaluation of mulches for use in the home garden. HortScience 18:180-182.
Bisgrove, R. 1990. Weed control: alternatives to herbicides. 30th Askam Bryan Amenity Technical Course. 1990, 27-38.
Bredell, G.A. and Barnard, C.J. Soil moisture conservation through mulching. Citrus and Sub-tropical Fruit J. 487, 13-16.
Burschel, P. 1961. Untersuchungen uber das Verhalten von Simazin im Boden. Weed Research 1, 131-141.
Bushnell, J. and Weaver, W.E. 1930. Straw mulch for early potatoes.
Campbell-Lloyd, R. 1986. Mulching - doing it right. Landscape Design 163:75.
Christensson, H. 1982. Costs of weed control in ornamental beds in parks. Proc. 23rd Swedish Weed Conf.
Clay, D.V. 1989. New developments in triazine and paraquat resistance and co-resistance in weed species in
England BrightonCrop Protection - Weeds 1989, 1, 317-324.
Clay, D.V. and Stephens, D. 1992. Herbicide use in industrial and amenity areas. The horticulturist. 1, 2, 5-8.
Creagur, R.A. and Katchur, D. 1975. An evaluation of plastic and fibrous materials as mulches for total vegetation control. HortScience 10:482.
Cullen, J.M. and Hasan, S (1988). Pathogens for the control of weeds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of
Davison, J.G. 1982. Black plastic benefits young fruit trees and bushes. Plasticulture 193:35-40.
Davison, J.G. 1983. Weed control in newly planted amenity trees. Proc. Symp. on Tree Establishment.
Davison J.G. and Baily, J.A. 1980. The effect of weeds on a range of nursery stock species planted as liners and grown for two seasons. Proc. Weed Control For. Conf. p.13-20.
Del Serrone, P. (1989). Mycoherbicides: an alternative control method. 161-166.
Gartner, J.B. 1978. Using bark and wood chips as a mulch for shrubs and evergreens. Amer Nurseryman 147(10):9, 53-55.
Harig, R. and Witt, W.W. 1984. Einfluss von Mulchmaterialien/ Substraten auf den Zuwachs von Rhododendron-Hybriden und den Unkrautbewuchs. Zeitschr. fur Vegetationstechnik im Landschafts und Sportstattenbau. 7(3)110-114.
Harris, F.A. and
Hass, H. and Streibig, J. 1990. Herbicide resistant weeds - threat or challenge? Proceedings of Meeting of EC Experts' Group,
Holmes, G.D. and Faulkner R. 1953. Experimental work in nurseries. For. Comm. Rept. For. Res. 1952, 15-28.
Ingle, A. 1981. Comparison of mulches in their effects on weed germination, soil nutrient status, soil physical conditions and worm population. Hort. Re. Centre, Levin. Final Rpt Expt No. 46/07.
Insley, H. 1981. Roadside and open space trees. Research for practical arboriculture. Seminar Proc. For. Comm. Occasional Paper 10:84-92.
Karbe, W. 1984. Mulchstoffe in Pfanzflachen Auswirkung von Pflegemassnahmen. Gartenamt 33(9):617-621.
Kolb, W. 1984. Wirksamkeit der Stickstoffdungungen auf die Kompostierung von Mulchstoffen in Pflanzflachen. Rasen Grundflachen Begrunungen 15(10):1-14.
Kolb, W., Schwarz, T. und Trunk, R. 1983. Kostens und Wirkungsvergleich bei die Verwendung verschiedene Mulchstoffe zu Pflanzungen im Rahmen der Bodenpflege. Zeitschrift fur Vegetationstechnik im Landschafts- und Sportstattenbau 6(2): 65-72.
Kolb, W., Schwarz, T. und Trunk, R. 1985. Auswirkung von Mulchabdenkungen auf Anwachsergebnis, Pflegekosten und Wachstum von niedringen Stauden und Geholzen. Rasen Grundflachen Begrunungen 16(4):120-126.
Litzow, M. und Pellet, H. 1983. Influence of mulch on growth of green ash. J. Arboricult. 9(1):7-11.
Maher, M. 1990. The value of spent mushroom compost as an organic manure. Proceedings 8th National Mushroom Conference. Teagasc,
Moosmann, A. and Koch, W. (1988). Soil disinfection by microwaves with special reference to weed control. Weed control in vegetable production. Proc. of meeting of the EC Experts' Group,
Paterson Walker Texas
Paul, D. and Ayres, P.G. (1987). The effect of rust infection of Senecio vulgaris on competition with lettuce. Weed Research 27, 431 - 441.
Robinson, D.W. (1989). Prevention of herbicide resistance by a programme of zero tolerance for weeds. Proceedings of Meeting of EC Experts' Group,
Robinson, D.W. and O'Kennedy, N.D. 1978. The effect of overall herbicide systems of soil management on the growth and yield of apple trees. Scientia Horticulturae. 9:127 - 136.
Rowe-Dutton, P. 1957. The mulching of vegetables. Commonwealth Bureau of Hort. and
Rowe-Dutton, P. 1976. Mulching is important. The Garden. J. Royal Hort. Soc. 101:135- 139.
Royal Horticultural Society. 1992. Weeds. Vol 4, Dictionary of Gardening. Editor in Chief Anthony Huxley. McMillan Press Ltd.
Scholl, W. and Schwemmer, E. 1982. Verwendung und Untersuchung von Baumrinden und Rinden Produkten. Deutscher Gartenbau 36(8):330-334.
Skroch, W.A. 1987. Weed control for woody ornamentals. American Nurseryman,
October 15, 1987, 69-70.
Sunderland, K.D. 1990. The future for biological control. Professional Horticulture. 4, 1, 11-20.
Tuefel, D. 1983. Strawdust - an alternative growing medium. Combined Proc. Intl. Plant Propagators' Soc. 33:71-72.
Vester, J. 1988. Flame cultivation for weed control. Weed control in vegetable production. Proc. of a meeting of the EC Experts' Group/Stuttgart, 1986. 153-167.
Werken, H. van de. 1981. Fertilisation and other factors enhancing the growth rate of shade trees. J. Arboricult. 7(2):33-37.
Whitcomb, C.E. 1978. Effects of black plastic and mulching on growth and survival of landscape plants.
Agric. Expt. Sta. Res. Rep. P-777, p.13.
Whitham, A.E. 1982. The effects of some methods of weed control on the growth of young plants.
Wright, T. 1982. Large gardens and parks. Maintenance, management and design.
Wright, T. 1985. Labour saving in the garden by design. The Garden. J. Royal Hort. Soc. 110(5):225-233.
[* Footnote. Since this article was written, the
herbicide, simazine, has been banned in Europe under Commission Decisions
2004/141/EC(3), 2004/248/EC(4), 2004/140/EC(5) and 2004/247/EC(6), taken within
the framework of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991. This came into
effect on 26th April 2004.]
[* Footnote. Since this article was written, the herbicide, simazine, has been banned in Europe under Commission Decisions 2004/141/EC(3), 2004/248/EC(4), 2004/140/EC(5) and 2004/247/EC(6), taken within the framework of Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991. This came into effect on 26th April 2004.]
Other pages related to David Robinson
This page was last updated on
This page was last updated on 06-Dec-2020 .